English Shorthand Dictation

The audio of the dictation at 80wpm

The Written Form of the Above Dictation

English Shorthand Dictation

Applying these principles to the facts of the case, the Court found that no candidate for the year 2001 had been appointed and, therefore, persons who were selected in that year were on a different footing as merely a person comes in the selected list, he has no right to be appointed on that ground. However, held the Court, those who had already been appointed and had completed about three years of service, some of them had even passed departmental test and some were given higher responsibilities and had even completed the period of probation or nearing the completion thereof and were working to the satisfaction of the authorities concerned, different yardsticks were to be applied while terminating their services. As a matter of fact, the Court found that apart from inferences drawn on certain facts and in particular the circumstances enumerated by the High Court, it was difficult to accept the contention of the State Government that it was absolutely impossible for it to separate the innocent candidates from the tainted ones. In the opinion of the Court, by appointing an independent scrutiny committee it was still possible to shift the evidence and separate tainted candidates from the innocent ones. The Court also recorded that relevant records were still available and had not been destroyed, which included question papers, answer sheets and other documents. (225 words)

Click on the Image to Download the Image form of the above Dictation.